linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: usb: usb-device: Add panel-location

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z35BnplCOVyboSBs@kekkonen.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 09:13:02 +0000
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
	Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: usb: usb-device: Add panel-location

Hi Ricardo,

On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:51:34AM +0100, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-device.yaml
> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-device.yaml
> > > index da890ee60ce6..5322772a4470 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-device.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-device.yaml
> > > @@ -37,6 +37,10 @@ properties:
> > >        but a device adhering to this binding may leave out all except
> > >        for "usbVID,PID".
> > >
> > > +  orientation:
> > > +    description: If present, specifies the orientation of the usb device.
> > > +    $ref: /schemas/media/video-interface-devices.yaml#/properties/orientation
> >
> > Do you need this for a camera or for other kinds of USB devices, too?
> >
> > What about e.g. the rotation property?
> 
> I need it for cameras. I do not have a usecase for rotation now, but I
> might have in the future.

If it's specific for cameras (UVC kind I presume?), wouldn't it be
reasonable to add specific bindings for it?

-- 
Sakari Ailus