[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0af017a8-8796-4552-aa16-bf2735f7b4ac@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 14:26:34 +0200
From: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@...il.com>
To: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>
Cc: rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Valentin Obst <kernel@...entinobst.de>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, airlied@...hat.com,
"open list:DMA MAPPING HELPERS" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] rust: add dma coherent allocator abstraction.
Hi Andreas,
On 19/12/2024 13:22, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
> If you include the `Allocator` trait and the `Pool` it would make my
> life a lot easier when rebasing nvme. For now I'm just going to use out
> of tree patches that include the dma pool.
>
> If you do not have a user for dma pool, maybe just include the
> `Allocator` trait and indicate that it is there to support other dma
> allocators in the future?
>
>
Would it be okay with you to have the basic functionality merged first?
Once this is done, I will send up a follow-up patch that would then
include the allocator trait and the pool.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Abdiel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists