[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250108124957.GA9312@willie-the-truck>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 12:49:58 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] arm64/sme: Collected SME fixes
On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 03:20:48PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> This series collects the various SME related fixes that were previously
> posted separately. These should address all the issues I am aware of so
> a patch which reenables the SME configuration option is also included.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Pull simplification of the signal restore code after the SME
> reenablement, it's not a fix but there's some code overlap.
> - Comment updates.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241203-arm64-sme-reenable-v1-0-d853479d1b77@kernel.org
Mark (R), are you happy with this? I know you were digging into some
other issues in this area but I'm not sure whether they invalidate the
fixes here or not.
Cheers,
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists