[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6f89cce5-4ddf-473f-9112-cc269961b012@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 15:01:45 +0100
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, willy@...radead.org, liam.howlett@...cle.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, mhocko@...e.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
mjguzik@...il.com, oliver.sang@...el.com, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
david@...hat.com, peterx@...hat.com, oleg@...hat.com, dave@...olabs.net,
paulmck@...nel.org, brauner@...nel.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
hdanton@...a.com, hughd@...gle.com, lokeshgidra@...gle.com,
minchan@...gle.com, jannh@...gle.com, shakeel.butt@...ux.dev,
souravpanda@...gle.com, pasha.tatashin@...een.com, klarasmodin@...il.com,
richard.weiyang@...il.com, corbet@....net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 04/16] mm: introduce vma_iter_store_attached() to use
with attached vmas
On 1/9/25 3:30 AM, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> vma_iter_store() functions can be used both when adding a new vma and
> when updating an existing one. However for existing ones we do not need
> to mark them attached as they are already marked that way. Introduce
> vma_iter_store_attached() to be used with already attached vmas.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists