linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 01/10] dt-bindings: net: ti: Adds device tree binding for DUAL-EMAC mode support on PRU-ICSS2 for AM57xx SOCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4a8fb859-e173-42bf-8d9b-8d6423f45a9b@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 15:16:05 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Basharath Hussain Khaja <basharath@...thit.com>
Cc: danishanwar@...com, rogerq@...nel.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
	davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
	conor+dt@...nel.org, nm@...com, ssantosh@...nel.org,
	tony@...mide.com, richardcochran@...il.com, parvathi@...thit.com,
	schnelle@...ux.ibm.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
	diogo.ivo@...mens.com, m-karicheri2@...com, horms@...nel.org,
	jacob.e.keller@...el.com, m-malladi@...com,
	javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com, afd@...com, s-anna@...com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, pratheesh@...com, prajith@...com,
	vigneshr@...com, praneeth@...com, srk@...com, rogerq@...com,
	krishna@...thit.com, pmohan@...thit.com, mohan@...thit.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/10] dt-bindings: net: ti: Adds device tree binding
 for DUAL-EMAC mode support on PRU-ICSS2 for AM57xx SOCs

On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 04:25:51PM +0530, Basharath Hussain Khaja wrote:
> From: Parvathi Pudi <parvathi@...thit.com>
> 
> Documentation update for the newly added "pruss2_eth" device tree
> node and its dependencies along with compatibility for PRU-ICSS
> Industrial Ethernet Peripheral (IEP), PRU-ICSS Enhanced Capture
> (eCAP) peripheral and using YAML binding document for AM57xx SoCs.

If i was to do a side by side diff with the ICSSG, how much would be
the same? Does it make sense to refactor this into a yaml file for all
the common properties, and then yaml files for all the specific
properties?

	Andrew