[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250109144124.a7MWASit@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 15:41:24 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] preempt: Add a generic function to return the
preemption string.
On 2025-01-09 15:37:01 [+0100], Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Upgrade brain. Also the proposed thing was just plain wrong.
Was it? For the !DYNAMIC case everything should be optimized away except
for the current case.
Let me try your thing to see what is different…
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists