linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 03/10] net: ti: prueth: Adds PRUETH HW and SW configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2f02964f-d143-4340-8284-790b5aa2901e@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 17:10:45 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Basharath Hussain Khaja <basharath@...thit.com>
Cc: danishanwar@...com, rogerq@...nel.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
	davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
	conor+dt@...nel.org, nm@...com, ssantosh@...nel.org,
	tony@...mide.com, richardcochran@...il.com, parvathi@...thit.com,
	schnelle@...ux.ibm.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
	diogo.ivo@...mens.com, m-karicheri2@...com, horms@...nel.org,
	jacob.e.keller@...el.com, m-malladi@...com,
	javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com, afd@...com, s-anna@...com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, pratheesh@...com, prajith@...com,
	vigneshr@...com, praneeth@...com, srk@...com, rogerq@...com,
	krishna@...thit.com, pmohan@...thit.com, mohan@...thit.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/10] net: ti: prueth: Adds PRUETH HW and SW
 configuration

> +/* Below macro is for 1528 Byte Frame support, to Allow even with
> + * Redundancy tag
> + */
> +#define PRUSS_MII_RT_RX_FRMS_MAX_SUPPORT_EMAC	(VLAN_ETH_FRAME_LEN + \
> +							ETH_FCS_LEN + 6)

Is 6 for the redundancy tag? Is the redundancy tag defined somewhere?
Could this 6 be replaced by a #define, which is maybe a sizeof()?

> +	dev_info(dev, "TI PRU ethernet driver initialized: %s EMAC mode\n",
> +		 (!eth0_node || !eth1_node) ? "single" : "dual");
> +

Is that really true? Is it not in dual mode, but only one interface is
in use? I also wounder at the value of spamming the log like this.

	Andrew