[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250109161802.3599-1-sensor1010@163.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:18:02 +0800
From: Lizhe <sensor1010@....com>
To: edumazet@...gle.com,
davem@...emloft.net,
dsahern@...nel.org,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
horms@...nel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lizhe <sensor1010@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] tcp: Add an extra check for consecutive failed keepalive probes
Add an additional check to handle situations where consecutive
keepalive probe packets are sent without receiving a response.
Signed-off-by: Lizhe <sensor1010@....com>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c
index b412ed88ccd9..5a5dee8cd6d3 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c
@@ -828,6 +828,12 @@ static void tcp_keepalive_timer (struct timer_list *t)
}
if (tcp_write_wakeup(sk, LINUX_MIB_TCPKEEPALIVE) <= 0) {
icsk->icsk_probes_out++;
+ if (icsk->icsk_probes_out >= keepalive_probes(tp)) {
+ tcp_send_active_reset(sk, GFP_ATOMIC,
+ SK_RST_REASON_TCP_KEEPALIVE_TIMEOUT);
+ tcp_write_err(sk);
+ goto out;
+ }
elapsed = keepalive_intvl_when(tp);
} else {
/* If keepalive was lost due to local congestion,
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists