[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <173644170629.2899934.9406584209909558440.b4-ty@sntech.de>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 17:55:18 +0100
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Klaus Goger <klaus.goger@...obroma-systems.com>,
Jakob Unterwurzacher <jakobunt@...il.com>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...rry.de>,
Jakob Unterwurzacher <jakob.unterwurzacher@...rry.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: dts: rockchip: increase gmac rx_delay on rk3399-puma
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 10:54:58 +0100, Jakob Unterwurzacher wrote:
> During mass manufacturing, we noticed the mmc_rx_crc_error counter,
> as reported by "ethtool -S eth0 | grep mmc_rx_crc_error", to increase
> above zero during nuttcp speedtests. Most of the time, this did not
> affect the achieved speed, but it prompted this investigation.
>
> Cycling through the rx_delay range on six boards (see table below) of
> various ages shows that there is a large good region from 0x12 to 0x35
> where we see zero crc errors on all tested boards.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] arm64: dts: rockchip: increase gmac rx_delay on rk3399-puma
commit: 9d241b06802c6c2176ae7aa4f9f17f8a577ed337
Best regards,
--
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists