[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250109175126.57878-8-sj@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 09:51:23 -0800
From: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
damon@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/10] Docs/mm/damon/design: document allow/reject DAMOS filter behaviors
Update DAMOS filters design document to describe the allow/reject
behavior of filters.
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
---
Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst b/Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst
index 449eb33688c2..667775bab86c 100644
--- a/Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst
+++ b/Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst
@@ -504,9 +504,34 @@ have a list of latency-critical processes.
To let users optimize DAMOS schemes with such special knowledge, DAMOS provides
a feature called DAMOS filters. The feature allows users to set an arbitrary
-number of filters for each scheme. Each filter specifies the type of target
-memory, and whether it should exclude the memory of the type (filter-out), or
-all except the memory of the type (filter-in).
+number of filters for each scheme. Each filter specifies
+
+- a type of memory (``type``),
+- whether it is for the memory of the type or all except the type
+ (``matching``), and
+- whether it is to allow (include) or reject (exclude) applying
+ the scheme's action to the memory (``allow``).
+
+When multiple filters are installed, each filter is evaluated in the installed
+order. If a part of memory is matched to one of the filter, next filters are
+ignored. If the memory passes through the filters evaluation stage because it
+is not matched to any of the filters, applying the scheme's action to it is
+allowed, same to the behavior when no filter exists.
+
+For example, let's assume 1) a filter for allowing anonymous pages and 2)
+another filter for rejecting young pages are installed in the order. If a page
+of a region that eligible to apply the scheme's action is an anonymous page,
+the scheme's action will be applied to the page regardless of whether it is
+young or not, since it matches with the first allow-filter. If the page is
+not anonymous but young, the scheme's action will not be applied, since the
+second reject-filter blocks it. If the page is neither anonymous nor young,
+the page will pass through the filters evaluation stage since there is no
+matching filter, and the action will be applied to the page.
+
+Note that the action can equally be applied to memory that either explicitly
+filter-allowed or filters evaluation stage passed. It means that installing
+allow-filters at the end of the list makes no practical change but only
+filters-checking overhead.
For efficient handling of filters, some types of filters are handled by the
core layer, while others are handled by operations set. In the latter case,
@@ -516,7 +541,7 @@ filter are not counted as the scheme has tried to the region. In contrast, if
a memory regions is filtered by an operations set layer-handled filter, it is
counted as the scheme has tried. This difference affects the statistics.
-Below types of filters are currently supported.
+Below ``type`` of filters are currently supported.
- anonymous page
- Applied to pages that containing data that not stored in files.
--
2.39.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists