[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f1f6af31-7667-4416-95d0-2f59c91a1b62@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 13:09:52 -0600
From: Wei Huang <wei.huang2@....com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
bhelgaas@...gle.com
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, helgaas@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, asml.silence@...il.com,
almasrymina@...gle.com, gospo@...adcom.com, michael.chan@...adcom.com,
ajit.khaparde@...adcom.com, somnath.kotur@...adcom.com,
andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com, manoj.panicker2@....com,
Eric.VanTassell@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 1/2] bnxt_en: Add TPH support in BNXT driver
On 1/8/25 05:33, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 15. 11. 24, 23:04, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 14:04:11 -0600 Wei Huang wrote:
>>> +static void bnxt_irq_affinity_release(struct kref __always_unused *ref)
>>
>> unused? you're using it now
>>
>>> +{
>>> + struct irq_affinity_notify *notify =
>>> + (struct irq_affinity_notify *)
>>> + container_of(ref, struct irq_affinity_notify, kref);
>>
>> this is ugly, and cast is unnecessary.
>>
>>> + struct bnxt_irq *irq;
>>> +
>>> + irq = container_of(notify, struct bnxt_irq, affinity_notify);
>>
>> since you init irq out of line you can as well init notify here
>>
>>> + if (pcie_tph_set_st_entry(irq->bp->pdev, irq->msix_nr, 0)) {
>>
>> You checked this function can sleep, right? Because rtnl_lock()
>> will sleep.
>
> Based on the above, I assume a new version was expected, but I cannot
> find any. So, Wei Huang, what's the status of this?
Currently the Broadcom team is driving the changes for upstream bnxt. I
will leave this question to them (Andy, Somnath, Michael).
>
> thanks,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists