[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d59e94e1-cffd-411f-95af-1ed6806ae5cb@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 14:53:40 -0800
From: Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Sean Paul
<sean@...rly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
"David
Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst
<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@...ll.ch>, <quic_ebharadw@...cinc.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Clark
<robdclark@...omium.org>,
Ville Syrjälä
<ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 18/25] drm/msm/dpu: Reserve resources for CWB
On 1/9/2025 2:13 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 at 23:26, Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/28/2024 8:47 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 26, 2024 at 02:49:28PM -0800, Jessica Zhang wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/20/2024 5:07 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 04:12:29PM -0800, Jessica Zhang wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/19/2024 9:52 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 04:43:29PM -0800, Jessica Zhang wrote:
>>>>>>>> Add support for RM to reserve dedicated CWB PINGPONGs and CWB muxes
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For concurrent writeback, even-indexed CWB muxes must be assigned to
>>>>>>>> even-indexed LMs and odd-indexed CWB muxes for odd-indexed LMs. The same
>>>>>>>> even/odd rule applies for dedicated CWB PINGPONGs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Track the CWB muxes in the global state and add a CWB-specific helper to
>>>>>>>> reserve the correct CWB muxes and dedicated PINGPONGs following the
>>>>>>>> even/odd rule.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c | 34 ++++++++++--
>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h | 2 +
>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.h | 1 +
>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>> 4 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
>>>>>>>> index a895d48fe81ccc71d265e089992786e8b6268b1b..a95dc1f0c6a422485c7ba98743e944e1a4f43539 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>>>>>>>> /*
>>>>>>>> * Copyright (C) 2013 Red Hat
>>>>>>>> * Copyright (c) 2014-2018, 2020-2021 The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
>>>>>>>> - * Copyright (c) 2022-2023 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
>>>>>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2022-2024 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>> * Author: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
>>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>>>>>>>> #include "dpu_hw_dsc.h"
>>>>>>>> #include "dpu_hw_merge3d.h"
>>>>>>>> #include "dpu_hw_cdm.h"
>>>>>>>> +#include "dpu_hw_cwb.h"
>>>>>>>> #include "dpu_formats.h"
>>>>>>>> #include "dpu_encoder_phys.h"
>>>>>>>> #include "dpu_crtc.h"
>>>>>>>> @@ -133,6 +134,9 @@ enum dpu_enc_rc_states {
>>>>>>>> * @cur_slave: As above but for the slave encoder.
>>>>>>>> * @hw_pp: Handle to the pingpong blocks used for the display. No.
>>>>>>>> * pingpong blocks can be different than num_phys_encs.
>>>>>>>> + * @hw_cwb: Handle to the CWB muxes used for concurrent writeback
>>>>>>>> + * display. Number of CWB muxes can be different than
>>>>>>>> + * num_phys_encs.
>>>>>>>> * @hw_dsc: Handle to the DSC blocks used for the display.
>>>>>>>> * @dsc_mask: Bitmask of used DSC blocks.
>>>>>>>> * @intfs_swapped: Whether or not the phys_enc interfaces have been swapped
>>>>>>>> @@ -177,6 +181,7 @@ struct dpu_encoder_virt {
>>>>>>>> struct dpu_encoder_phys *cur_master;
>>>>>>>> struct dpu_encoder_phys *cur_slave;
>>>>>>>> struct dpu_hw_pingpong *hw_pp[MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC];
>>>>>>>> + struct dpu_hw_cwb *hw_cwb[MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC];
>>>>>>>> struct dpu_hw_dsc *hw_dsc[MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC];
>>>>>>>> unsigned int dsc_mask;
>>>>>>>> @@ -1138,7 +1143,10 @@ static void dpu_encoder_virt_atomic_mode_set(struct drm_encoder *drm_enc,
>>>>>>>> struct dpu_hw_blk *hw_pp[MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC];
>>>>>>>> struct dpu_hw_blk *hw_ctl[MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC];
>>>>>>>> struct dpu_hw_blk *hw_dsc[MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC];
>>>>>>>> + struct dpu_hw_blk *hw_cwb[MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC];
>>>>>>>> int num_pp, num_dsc, num_ctl;
>>>>>>>> + int num_cwb = 0;
>>>>>>>> + bool is_cwb_encoder;
>>>>>>>> unsigned int dsc_mask = 0;
>>>>>>>> int i;
>>>>>>>> @@ -1152,6 +1160,8 @@ static void dpu_encoder_virt_atomic_mode_set(struct drm_encoder *drm_enc,
>>>>>>>> priv = drm_enc->dev->dev_private;
>>>>>>>> dpu_kms = to_dpu_kms(priv->kms);
>>>>>>>> + is_cwb_encoder = drm_crtc_in_clone_mode(crtc_state) &&
>>>>>>>> + dpu_enc->disp_info.intf_type == INTF_WB;
>>>>>>>> global_state = dpu_kms_get_existing_global_state(dpu_kms);
>>>>>>>> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(global_state)) {
>>>>>>>> @@ -1162,9 +1172,25 @@ static void dpu_encoder_virt_atomic_mode_set(struct drm_encoder *drm_enc,
>>>>>>>> trace_dpu_enc_mode_set(DRMID(drm_enc));
>>>>>>>> /* Query resource that have been reserved in atomic check step. */
>>>>>>>> - num_pp = dpu_rm_get_assigned_resources(&dpu_kms->rm, global_state,
>>>>>>>> - drm_enc->crtc, DPU_HW_BLK_PINGPONG, hw_pp,
>>>>>>>> - ARRAY_SIZE(hw_pp));
>>>>>>>> + if (is_cwb_encoder) {
>>>>>>>> + num_pp = dpu_rm_get_assigned_resources(&dpu_kms->rm, global_state,
>>>>>>>> + drm_enc->crtc,
>>>>>>>> + DPU_HW_BLK_DCWB_PINGPONG,
>>>>>>>> + hw_pp, ARRAY_SIZE(hw_pp));
>>>>>>>> + num_cwb = dpu_rm_get_assigned_resources(&dpu_kms->rm, global_state,
>>>>>>>> + drm_enc->crtc,
>>>>>>>> + DPU_HW_BLK_CWB,
>>>>>>>> + hw_cwb, ARRAY_SIZE(hw_cwb));
>>>>>>>> + } else {
>>>>>>>> + num_pp = dpu_rm_get_assigned_resources(&dpu_kms->rm, global_state,
>>>>>>>> + drm_enc->crtc,
>>>>>>>> + DPU_HW_BLK_PINGPONG, hw_pp,
>>>>>>>> + ARRAY_SIZE(hw_pp));
>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < num_cwb; i++)
>>>>>>>> + dpu_enc->hw_cwb[i] = to_dpu_hw_cwb(hw_cwb[i]);
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> num_ctl = dpu_rm_get_assigned_resources(&dpu_kms->rm, global_state,
>>>>>>>> drm_enc->crtc, DPU_HW_BLK_CTL, hw_ctl, ARRAY_SIZE(hw_ctl));
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h
>>>>>>>> index ba7bb05efe9b8cac01a908e53121117e130f91ec..8d820cd1b5545d247515763039b341184e814e32 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h
>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h
>>>>>>>> @@ -77,12 +77,14 @@ enum dpu_hw_blk_type {
>>>>>>>> DPU_HW_BLK_LM,
>>>>>>>> DPU_HW_BLK_CTL,
>>>>>>>> DPU_HW_BLK_PINGPONG,
>>>>>>>> + DPU_HW_BLK_DCWB_PINGPONG,
>>>>>>>> DPU_HW_BLK_INTF,
>>>>>>>> DPU_HW_BLK_WB,
>>>>>>>> DPU_HW_BLK_DSPP,
>>>>>>>> DPU_HW_BLK_MERGE_3D,
>>>>>>>> DPU_HW_BLK_DSC,
>>>>>>>> DPU_HW_BLK_CDM,
>>>>>>>> + DPU_HW_BLK_CWB,
>>>>>>>> DPU_HW_BLK_MAX,
>>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.h
>>>>>>>> index 48d756d8f8c6e4ab94b72bac0418320f7dc8cda8..1fc8abda927fc094b369e0d1efc795b71d6a7fcb 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.h
>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.h
>>>>>>>> @@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ struct dpu_global_state {
>>>>>>>> uint32_t dspp_to_crtc_id[DSPP_MAX - DSPP_0];
>>>>>>>> uint32_t dsc_to_crtc_id[DSC_MAX - DSC_0];
>>>>>>>> uint32_t cdm_to_crtc_id;
>>>>>>>> + uint32_t cwb_to_crtc_id[CWB_MAX - CWB_0];
>>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>> struct dpu_global_state
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c
>>>>>>>> index 85adaf256b2c705d2d7df378b6ffc0e578f52bc3..ead24bb0ceb5d8ec4705f0d32330294d0b45b216 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -234,6 +234,55 @@ static int _dpu_rm_get_lm_peer(struct dpu_rm *rm, int primary_idx)
>>>>>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>> +static int _dpu_rm_reserve_cwb_mux_and_pingpongs(struct dpu_rm *rm,
>>>>>>>> + struct dpu_global_state *global_state,
>>>>>>>> + uint32_t crtc_id,
>>>>>>>> + struct msm_display_topology *topology)
>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>> + int num_cwb_pp = topology->num_lm, cwb_pp_count = 0;
>>>>>>>> + int cwb_pp_start_idx = PINGPONG_CWB_0 - PINGPONG_0;
>>>>>>>> + int cwb_pp_idx[MAX_BLOCKS];
>>>>>>>> + int cwb_mux_idx[MAX_BLOCKS];
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + /*
>>>>>>>> + * Reserve additional dedicated CWB PINGPONG blocks and muxes for each
>>>>>>>> + * mixer
>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>> + * TODO: add support reserving resources for platforms with no
>>>>>>>> + * PINGPONG_CWB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What about doing it other way around: allocate CWBs first as required
>>>>>>> (even/odd, proper count, etc). Then for each of CWBs allocate a PP block
>>>>>>> (I think it's enough to simply make CWB blocks have a corresponding PP
>>>>>>> index as a property). This way the driver can handle both legacy and
>>>>>>> current platforms.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Dmitry,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry if I'm misunderstanding your suggestion, but the main change needed to
>>>>>> support platforms with no dedicated PINGPONG_CWB is where in the
>>>>>> rm->pingpong_blks list to start assigning pingpong blocks for the CWB mux.
>>>>>> I'm not sure how changing the order in which CWBs and the pingpong blocks
>>>>>> are assigned will address that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (FWIW, the only change necessary to add support for non-dedicated
>>>>>> PINGPONG_CWBs platforms for this function should just be changing the
>>>>>> initialization value of cwb_pp_start_idx)
>>>>>
>>>>> If I remember correctly, we have identified several generations of DPU
>>>>> wrt. CWB handling:
>>>>> - 8.1+ (or 8.0+?), DCWB, dedicated PP blocks
>>>>> - 7.2, dedicated PP_1?
>>>>> - 5.0+, shared PP blocks
>>>>> - older DPUs, special handling of PP
>>>>>
>>>>> If the driver allocates PP first and then first it has to allocated PP
>>>>> (in a platform-specific way) and then go from PINGPONG to CWB (in a
>>>>> platform-specific way). If CWB is allocated first, then you have only
>>>>> one platform-specific piece of code that gets PINGPONG for the CWB (and
>>>>> as this function is called after the CWB allocation, the major part of
>>>>> the CWB / PP allocation is generic).
>>>>
>>>> The issue with breaking this into separate helpers/functions is that the CWB
>>>> mux and PPB indices are dependent on each other. But I agree that we can
>>>> reserve CWB mux and the PPBs in 2 separate loops within this helper to
>>>> minimize the special platform-specific handling.
>>>
>>> Doesn't it just PPB depend on CWB?
>>
>> Sorry, poor wording on my part. Was referring specifically to this part
>> of the logic within the code chunk:
>>
>> ```
>> cwb_pp_idx[cwb_pp_count] = j;
>> cwb_mux_idx[cwb_pp_count] = j - cwb_pp_start_idx;
>> ```
>>
>> The point I wanted to make was that I think we can keep the CWB-specific
>> reservation of the the PPBs and muxes in this function, but I agree with
>> your suggestion to reserve the CWBs first and the PPBs second (just in
>> separate loops rather than separate functions).
>
> Sounds fine with me. I don't think you even need a second loop, just
> simple maths should be fine.
Got it.. do you mean just swapping the current for loop logic to loop
over all the CWB blocks instead?
So something like:
```
for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rm->mixer_blks) &&
cwb_pp_count < num_cwb_pp; i++) {
for (int j = cwb_pp_start_idx;
j < ARRAY_SIZE(rm->cwb_blks); j++) {
/*
* Odd LMs must be assigned to odd PINGPONGs and even
* LMs with even PINGPONGs
*/
if (reserved_by_other(global_state->cwb_to_crtc_id, j, crtc_id) ||
i % 2 != j % 2)
continue;
cwb_mux_idx[cwb_pp_count] = j;
cwb_pp_idx[cwb_pp_count] = j + cwb_pp_start_idx;
cwb_pp_count++;
break;
}
}
```
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Also wanted to note that the comment doc on the PPB odd/even rule is
>>>> inaccurate -- technically the odd/even rule applies specifically to the CWB
>>>> mux as odd/even LMs are hardwired to their respective CWB muxes. Will
>>>> correct the comment doc to be more accurate.
>>>
>>> Yes, please fix that.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Jessica Zhang
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> With best wishes
>>> Dmitry
>>
>
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists