| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202501100757.HDb5slrv-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 07:55:22 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, kernel-team@...a.com, andrii@...nel.org,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, martin.lau@...ux.dev,
kpsingh@...nel.org, mattbobrowski@...gle.com, paul@...l-moore.com,
jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com, memxor@...il.com,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 bpf-next 5/7] bpf: Use btf_kfunc_id_set.remap logic
for bpf_dynptr_from_skb
Hi Song,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on bpf-next/master]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Song-Liu/fs-xattr-bpf-Introduce-security-bpf-xattr-name-prefix/20250109-065503
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250108225140.3467654-6-song%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH v8 bpf-next 5/7] bpf: Use btf_kfunc_id_set.remap logic for bpf_dynptr_from_skb
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-005-20250110 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250110/202501100757.HDb5slrv-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250110/202501100757.HDb5slrv-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501100757.HDb5slrv-lkp@intel.com/
All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> net/core/filter.c:12071:1: error: return type defaults to 'int' [-Werror=implicit-int]
12071 | BTF_HIDDEN_KFUNCS_START(bpf_kfunc_check_hidden_set_skb)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> net/core/filter.c:12071:1: error: function declaration isn't a prototype [-Werror=strict-prototypes]
In file included from include/linux/btf.h:10,
from include/linux/bpf.h:28,
from include/linux/bpf_verifier.h:7,
from net/core/filter.c:21:
net/core/filter.c: In function 'BTF_HIDDEN_KFUNCS_START':
>> net/core/filter.c:12075:18: error: storage class specified for parameter 'bpf_kfunc_check_set_xdp'
12075 | BTF_KFUNCS_START(bpf_kfunc_check_set_xdp)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/btf_ids.h:235:73: note: in definition of macro 'BTF_KFUNCS_START'
235 | #define BTF_KFUNCS_START(name) static struct btf_id_set8 __maybe_unused name = { .flags = BTF_SET8_KFUNCS };
| ^~~~
>> include/linux/btf_ids.h:235:46: error: parameter 'bpf_kfunc_check_set_xdp' is initialized
235 | #define BTF_KFUNCS_START(name) static struct btf_id_set8 __maybe_unused name = { .flags = BTF_SET8_KFUNCS };
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
net/core/filter.c:12075:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BTF_KFUNCS_START'
12075 | BTF_KFUNCS_START(bpf_kfunc_check_set_xdp)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> net/core/filter.c:12079:18: error: storage class specified for parameter 'bpf_kfunc_check_set_sock_addr'
12079 | BTF_KFUNCS_START(bpf_kfunc_check_set_sock_addr)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/btf_ids.h:235:73: note: in definition of macro 'BTF_KFUNCS_START'
235 | #define BTF_KFUNCS_START(name) static struct btf_id_set8 __maybe_unused name = { .flags = BTF_SET8_KFUNCS };
| ^~~~
>> include/linux/btf_ids.h:235:46: error: parameter 'bpf_kfunc_check_set_sock_addr' is initialized
235 | #define BTF_KFUNCS_START(name) static struct btf_id_set8 __maybe_unused name = { .flags = BTF_SET8_KFUNCS };
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
net/core/filter.c:12079:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BTF_KFUNCS_START'
12079 | BTF_KFUNCS_START(bpf_kfunc_check_set_sock_addr)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> net/core/filter.c:12083:18: error: storage class specified for parameter 'bpf_kfunc_check_set_tcp_reqsk'
12083 | BTF_KFUNCS_START(bpf_kfunc_check_set_tcp_reqsk)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/btf_ids.h:235:73: note: in definition of macro 'BTF_KFUNCS_START'
235 | #define BTF_KFUNCS_START(name) static struct btf_id_set8 __maybe_unused name = { .flags = BTF_SET8_KFUNCS };
| ^~~~
>> include/linux/btf_ids.h:235:46: error: parameter 'bpf_kfunc_check_set_tcp_reqsk' is initialized
235 | #define BTF_KFUNCS_START(name) static struct btf_id_set8 __maybe_unused name = { .flags = BTF_SET8_KFUNCS };
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
net/core/filter.c:12083:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BTF_KFUNCS_START'
12083 | BTF_KFUNCS_START(bpf_kfunc_check_set_tcp_reqsk)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> net/core/filter.c:12087:13: error: storage class specified for parameter 'bpf_dynptr_from_skb_list'
12087 | BTF_ID_LIST(bpf_dynptr_from_skb_list)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/btf_ids.h:223:53: note: in definition of macro 'BTF_ID_LIST'
223 | #define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[64];
| ^~~~
>> net/core/filter.c:12092:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
12092 | {
| ^
>> net/core/filter.c:12122:38: error: storage class specified for parameter 'bpf_kfunc_set_skb'
12122 | static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_kfunc_set_skb = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> net/core/filter.c:12122:21: error: parameter 'bpf_kfunc_set_skb' is initialized
12122 | static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_kfunc_set_skb = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> net/core/filter.c:12125:24: error: 'bpf_kfunc_check_hidden_set_skb' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'bpf_kfunc_check_set_skb'?
12125 | .hidden_set = &bpf_kfunc_check_hidden_set_skb,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| bpf_kfunc_check_set_skb
net/core/filter.c:12125:24: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>> net/core/filter.c:12126:19: error: 'bpf_kfunc_set_skb_remap' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'bpf_kfunc_set_skb'?
12126 | .remap = &bpf_kfunc_set_skb_remap,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| bpf_kfunc_set_skb
>> net/core/filter.c:12129:38: error: storage class specified for parameter 'bpf_kfunc_set_xdp'
12129 | static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_kfunc_set_xdp = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> net/core/filter.c:12129:21: error: parameter 'bpf_kfunc_set_xdp' is initialized
12129 | static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_kfunc_set_xdp = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> net/core/filter.c:12134:38: error: storage class specified for parameter 'bpf_kfunc_set_sock_addr'
12134 | static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_kfunc_set_sock_addr = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> net/core/filter.c:12134:21: error: parameter 'bpf_kfunc_set_sock_addr' is initialized
12134 | static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_kfunc_set_sock_addr = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> net/core/filter.c:12139:38: error: storage class specified for parameter 'bpf_kfunc_set_tcp_reqsk'
12139 | static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_kfunc_set_tcp_reqsk = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> net/core/filter.c:12139:21: error: parameter 'bpf_kfunc_set_tcp_reqsk' is initialized
12139 | static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_kfunc_set_tcp_reqsk = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/core/filter.c:12145:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
12145 | {
| ^
In file included from <command-line>:
include/linux/compiler.h:189:45: error: storage class specified for parameter '__UNIQUE_ID___addressable_bpf_kfunc_init1505'
189 | #define __UNIQUE_ID(prefix) __PASTE(__PASTE(__UNIQUE_ID_, prefix), __COUNTER__)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler_types.h:83:23: note: in definition of macro '___PASTE'
83 | #define ___PASTE(a,b) a##b
| ^
include/linux/compiler.h:189:29: note: in expansion of macro '__PASTE'
189 | #define __UNIQUE_ID(prefix) __PASTE(__PASTE(__UNIQUE_ID_, prefix), __COUNTER__)
| ^~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler_types.h:84:22: note: in expansion of macro '___PASTE'
84 | #define __PASTE(a,b) ___PASTE(a,b)
| ^~~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:189:37: note: in expansion of macro '__PASTE'
189 | #define __UNIQUE_ID(prefix) __PASTE(__PASTE(__UNIQUE_ID_, prefix), __COUNTER__)
| ^~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:227:9: note: in expansion of macro '__UNIQUE_ID'
227 | __UNIQUE_ID(__PASTE(__addressable_,sym)) = (void *)(uintptr_t)&sym;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:229:9: note: in expansion of macro '___ADDRESSABLE'
229 | ___ADDRESSABLE(sym, __section(".discard.addressable"))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:256:9: note: in expansion of macro '__ADDRESSABLE'
256 | __ADDRESSABLE(fn)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:261:9: note: in expansion of macro '__define_initcall_stub'
261 | __define_initcall_stub(__stub, fn) \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:274:9: note: in expansion of macro '____define_initcall'
274 | ____define_initcall(fn, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:280:9: note: in expansion of macro '__unique_initcall'
280 | __unique_initcall(fn, id, __sec, __initcall_id(fn))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:282:35: note: in expansion of macro '___define_initcall'
282 | #define __define_initcall(fn, id) ___define_initcall(fn, id, .initcall##id)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:313:41: note: in expansion of macro '__define_initcall'
313 | #define late_initcall(fn) __define_initcall(fn, 7)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/core/filter.c:12164:1: note: in expansion of macro 'late_initcall'
12164 | late_initcall(bpf_kfunc_init);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/core/filter.c:12164:1: error: parameter '__UNIQUE_ID___addressable_bpf_kfunc_init1505' is initialized
net/core/filter.c:12164:1: warning: 'used' attribute ignored [-Wattributes]
include/linux/compiler.h:189:45: error: section attribute not allowed for '__UNIQUE_ID___addressable_bpf_kfunc_init1505'
189 | #define __UNIQUE_ID(prefix) __PASTE(__PASTE(__UNIQUE_ID_, prefix), __COUNTER__)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler_types.h:83:23: note: in definition of macro '___PASTE'
83 | #define ___PASTE(a,b) a##b
| ^
include/linux/compiler.h:189:29: note: in expansion of macro '__PASTE'
189 | #define __UNIQUE_ID(prefix) __PASTE(__PASTE(__UNIQUE_ID_, prefix), __COUNTER__)
| ^~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler_types.h:84:22: note: in expansion of macro '___PASTE'
84 | #define __PASTE(a,b) ___PASTE(a,b)
| ^~~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:189:37: note: in expansion of macro '__PASTE'
189 | #define __UNIQUE_ID(prefix) __PASTE(__PASTE(__UNIQUE_ID_, prefix), __COUNTER__)
| ^~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:227:9: note: in expansion of macro '__UNIQUE_ID'
227 | __UNIQUE_ID(__PASTE(__addressable_,sym)) = (void *)(uintptr_t)&sym;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:229:9: note: in expansion of macro '___ADDRESSABLE'
229 | ___ADDRESSABLE(sym, __section(".discard.addressable"))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:256:9: note: in expansion of macro '__ADDRESSABLE'
256 | __ADDRESSABLE(fn)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:261:9: note: in expansion of macro '__define_initcall_stub'
261 | __define_initcall_stub(__stub, fn) \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:274:9: note: in expansion of macro '____define_initcall'
274 | ____define_initcall(fn, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:280:9: note: in expansion of macro '__unique_initcall'
280 | __unique_initcall(fn, id, __sec, __initcall_id(fn))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:282:35: note: in expansion of macro '___define_initcall'
282 | #define __define_initcall(fn, id) ___define_initcall(fn, id, .initcall##id)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:313:41: note: in expansion of macro '__define_initcall'
313 | #define late_initcall(fn) __define_initcall(fn, 7)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/core/filter.c:12164:1: note: in expansion of macro 'late_initcall'
12164 | late_initcall(bpf_kfunc_init);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:5,
from include/linux/atomic.h:7,
from net/core/filter.c:20:
net/core/filter.c:12164:15: error: 'bpf_kfunc_init' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'bpf_func_info'?
12164 | late_initcall(bpf_kfunc_init);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:227:72: note: in definition of macro '___ADDRESSABLE'
227 | __UNIQUE_ID(__PASTE(__addressable_,sym)) = (void *)(uintptr_t)&sym;
vim +/int +12071 net/core/filter.c
12070
12071 BTF_HIDDEN_KFUNCS_START(bpf_kfunc_check_hidden_set_skb)
12072 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_from_skb_rdonly, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
12073 BTF_KFUNCS_END(bpf_kfunc_check_hidden_set_skb)
12074
12075 BTF_KFUNCS_START(bpf_kfunc_check_set_xdp)
12076 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_from_xdp)
12077 BTF_KFUNCS_END(bpf_kfunc_check_set_xdp)
12078
12079 BTF_KFUNCS_START(bpf_kfunc_check_set_sock_addr)
12080 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_sock_addr_set_sun_path)
12081 BTF_KFUNCS_END(bpf_kfunc_check_set_sock_addr)
12082
12083 BTF_KFUNCS_START(bpf_kfunc_check_set_tcp_reqsk)
12084 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_sk_assign_tcp_reqsk, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
12085 BTF_KFUNCS_END(bpf_kfunc_check_set_tcp_reqsk)
12086
12087 BTF_ID_LIST(bpf_dynptr_from_skb_list)
12088 BTF_ID(func, bpf_dynptr_from_skb)
12089 BTF_ID(func, bpf_dynptr_from_skb_rdonly)
12090
12091 static u32 bpf_kfunc_set_skb_remap(const struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 kfunc_id)
12092 {
12093 if (kfunc_id != bpf_dynptr_from_skb_list[0])
12094 return 0;
12095
12096 switch (resolve_prog_type(prog)) {
12097 /* Program types only with direct read access go here! */
12098 case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN:
12099 case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_OUT:
12100 case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL:
12101 case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_REUSEPORT:
12102 case BPF_PROG_TYPE_FLOW_DISSECTOR:
12103 case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB:
12104 return bpf_dynptr_from_skb_list[1];
12105
12106 /* Program types with direct read + write access go here! */
12107 case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS:
12108 case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_ACT:
12109 case BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP:
12110 case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT:
12111 case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB:
12112 case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG:
12113 case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCKOPT:
12114 return kfunc_id;
12115
12116 default:
12117 break;
12118 }
12119 return bpf_dynptr_from_skb_list[1];
12120 }
12121
12122 static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_kfunc_set_skb = {
12123 .owner = THIS_MODULE,
12124 .set = &bpf_kfunc_check_set_skb,
12125 .hidden_set = &bpf_kfunc_check_hidden_set_skb,
12126 .remap = &bpf_kfunc_set_skb_remap,
12127 };
12128
12129 static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_kfunc_set_xdp = {
12130 .owner = THIS_MODULE,
12131 .set = &bpf_kfunc_check_set_xdp,
12132 };
12133
12134 static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_kfunc_set_sock_addr = {
12135 .owner = THIS_MODULE,
12136 .set = &bpf_kfunc_check_set_sock_addr,
12137 };
12138
12139 static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_kfunc_set_tcp_reqsk = {
12140 .owner = THIS_MODULE,
12141 .set = &bpf_kfunc_check_set_tcp_reqsk,
12142 };
12143
12144 static int __init bpf_kfunc_init(void)
12145 {
12146 int ret;
12147
12148 ret = register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &bpf_kfunc_set_skb);
12149 ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_ACT, &bpf_kfunc_set_skb);
12150 ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, &bpf_kfunc_set_skb);
12151 ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, &bpf_kfunc_set_skb);
12152 ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB, &bpf_kfunc_set_skb);
12153 ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_OUT, &bpf_kfunc_set_skb);
12154 ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN, &bpf_kfunc_set_skb);
12155 ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT, &bpf_kfunc_set_skb);
12156 ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL, &bpf_kfunc_set_skb);
12157 ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_NETFILTER, &bpf_kfunc_set_skb);
12158 ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, &bpf_kfunc_set_skb);
12159 ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, &bpf_kfunc_set_xdp);
12160 ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR,
12161 &bpf_kfunc_set_sock_addr);
12162 return ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &bpf_kfunc_set_tcp_reqsk);
12163 }
12164 late_initcall(bpf_kfunc_init);
12165
12166 __bpf_kfunc_start_defs();
12167
12168 /* bpf_sock_destroy: Destroy the given socket with ECONNABORTED error code.
12169 *
12170 * The function expects a non-NULL pointer to a socket, and invokes the
12171 * protocol specific socket destroy handlers.
12172 *
12173 * The helper can only be called from BPF contexts that have acquired the socket
12174 * locks.
12175 *
12176 * Parameters:
12177 * @sock: Pointer to socket to be destroyed
12178 *
12179 * Return:
12180 * On error, may return EPROTONOSUPPORT, EINVAL.
12181 * EPROTONOSUPPORT if protocol specific destroy handler is not supported.
12182 * 0 otherwise
12183 */
12184 __bpf_kfunc int bpf_sock_destroy(struct sock_common *sock)
12185 {
12186 struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)sock;
12187
12188 /* The locking semantics that allow for synchronous execution of the
12189 * destroy handlers are only supported for TCP and UDP.
12190 * Supporting protocols will need to acquire sock lock in the BPF context
12191 * prior to invoking this kfunc.
12192 */
12193 if (!sk->sk_prot->diag_destroy || (sk->sk_protocol != IPPROTO_TCP &&
12194 sk->sk_protocol != IPPROTO_UDP))
12195 return -EOPNOTSUPP;
12196
12197 return sk->sk_prot->diag_destroy(sk, ECONNABORTED);
12198 }
12199
12200 __bpf_kfunc_end_defs();
12201
12202 BTF_KFUNCS_START(bpf_sk_iter_kfunc_ids)
12203 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_sock_destroy, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
12204 BTF_KFUNCS_END(bpf_sk_iter_kfunc_ids)
12205
12206 static int tracing_iter_filter(const struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 kfunc_id)
12207 {
12208 if (btf_id_set8_contains(&bpf_sk_iter_kfunc_ids, kfunc_id) &&
12209 prog->expected_attach_type != BPF_TRACE_ITER)
12210 return -EACCES;
12211 return 0;
12212 }
12213
12214 static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_sk_iter_kfunc_set = {
12215 .owner = THIS_MODULE,
12216 .set = &bpf_sk_iter_kfunc_ids,
12217 .filter = tracing_iter_filter,
12218 };
12219
12220 static int init_subsystem(void)
12221 {
12222 return register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, &bpf_sk_iter_kfunc_set);
12223 }
12224 late_initcall(init_subsystem);
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists