[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z39jvq4CsBjurJ1v@liuwe-devbox-debian-v2>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 05:50:54 +0000
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
To: Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Roman Kisel <romank@...ux.microsoft.com>, hpa@...or.com,
kys@...rosoft.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
decui@...rosoft.com, eahariha@...ux.microsoft.com,
haiyangz@...rosoft.com, mingo@...hat.com, mhklinux@...look.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, tiala@...rosoft.com, wei.liu@...nel.org,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, apais@...rosoft.com, benhill@...rosoft.com,
ssengar@...rosoft.com, sunilmut@...rosoft.com, vdso@...bites.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] hyperv: Define struct hv_output_get_vp_registers
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 03:25:22PM -0800, Nuno Das Neves wrote:
> On 1/8/2025 2:21 PM, Roman Kisel wrote:
> > There is no definition of the output structure for the
> > GetVpRegisters hypercall. Hence, using the hypercall
> > is not possible when the output value has some structure
> > to it. Even getting a datum of a primitive type reads
> > as ad-hoc without that definition.
> >
> > Define struct hv_output_get_vp_registers to enable using
> > the GetVpRegisters hypercall. Make provisions for all
> > supported architectures. No functional changes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Roman Kisel <romank@...ux.microsoft.com>
> > ---
> > include/hyperv/hvgdk_mini.h | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/hyperv/hvgdk_mini.h b/include/hyperv/hvgdk_mini.h
> > index db3d1aaf7330..4fffca9e16df 100644
> > --- a/include/hyperv/hvgdk_mini.h
> > +++ b/include/hyperv/hvgdk_mini.h
> > @@ -1068,6 +1068,35 @@ union hv_dispatch_suspend_register {
> > } __packed;
> > };
> >
> > +union hv_arm64_pending_interruption_register {
> > + u64 as_uint64;
> > + struct {
> > + u64 interruption_pending : 1;
> > + u64 interruption_type: 1;
> > + u64 reserved : 30;
> > + u64 error_code : 32;
> > + } __packed;
> > +};
> > +
> > +union hv_arm64_interrupt_state_register {
> > + u64 as_uint64;
> > + struct {
> > + u64 interrupt_shadow : 1;
> > + u64 reserved : 63;
> > + } __packed;
> > +};
> > +
> > +union hv_arm64_pending_synthetic_exception_event {
> > + u64 as_uint64[2];
> > + struct {
> > + u8 event_pending : 1;
> > + u8 event_type : 3;
> > + u8 reserved : 4;
> > + u8 rsvd[3];
> > + u64 context;
> > + } __packed;
> > +};
> > +
>
> You've omitted the exception_type field.
> This is how it should be:
>
> union hv_arm64_pending_synthetic_exception_event {
> u64 as_uint64[2];
> struct {
> u8 event_pending : 1;
> u8 event_type : 3;
> u8 reserved : 4;
> u8 rsvd[3];
> u32 exception_type;
> u64 context;
> } __packed;
> };
>
I can fix this when I commit the change . This patch will be folded into
your old one anyway.
Thanks,
Wei.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists