[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y0zk26ko.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 00:07:19 +0000
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
To: Laurentiu Mihalcea <laurentiumihalcea111@...il.com>
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] ASoC: simple-card-utils: fix priv->dai_props indexing
Hi Laurentiu
> >> +#define runtime_simple_priv_to_props(priv, rtd)
> >> + ((priv)->dai_props + ((rtd)->dai_link - (priv)->dai_link))
> > Oh yes, indeed.
> >
> > But I wonder it is needed not only utils, but all drivers
> > (= simple-card/audio-graph-card/audio-graph-card2).
>
> At this point I'd say there's no need to do the replacement anywhere else. That's because the code
> still using simple_priv_to_props() makes use of the link number to index the array, which is fine.
> This is opposed to the PCM runtime data ID that may not correspond to a link number, thus making it
> unfit for use as an array index.
Oops, my previous mail indicates strange sample.
I would like to tell was update simple_priv_to_props() itself
- #define simple_priv_to_props(priv, i) ((priv)->dai_props + (i))
+ #define simple_priv_to_props(priv, rtd) \
+ ((priv)->dai_props + ((rtd)->dai_link - (priv)->dai_link))
...
- simple_priv_to_props(priv, rtd->id);
+ simple_priv_to_props(priv, rtd);
Thank you for your help !!
Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto
Powered by blists - more mailing lists