[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z3909uubxHn8mk0Q@tlindgre-MOBL1>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 09:04:22 +0200
From: Tony Lindgren <tony.lindgren@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>,
Rick P Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>, Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>,
"isaku.yamahata@...il.com" <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Yan Y Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/25] TDX vCPU/VM creation
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 07:01:01AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2025, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 02:41:51PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> > > On 7.01.25 г. 9:37 ч., Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > > > @@ -139,6 +139,8 @@ __read_mostly DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(kvm_has_noapic_vcpu);
> > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_has_noapic_vcpu);
> > > > __read_mostly DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_DEFERRED_FALSE(apic_hw_disabled, HZ);
> > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(apic_hw_disabled);
> > >
> > > Is it really required to expose this symbol? apic_hw_disabled is defined as
> > > static inline in the header?
>
> No, apic_hw_disabled can't be "static inline", because it's a variable, not a
> function.
>
> > For loadable modules yes, otherwise we'll get:
> >
> > ERROR: modpost: "apic_hw_disabled" [arch/x86/kvm/kvm-intel.ko] undefined!
> >
> > This is similar to the EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_has_noapic_vcpu) already
> > there.
>
> Heh, which is a hint that you're using the wrong helper. TDX should check
> lapic_in_kernel(), not kvm_apic_present(). The former verifies that local APIC
> emulation/virtualization is handed in-kernel, i.e. by KVM. The latter checks
> that the local APIC is in-kernel *and* that the vCPU's local APIC is hardware
> enabled, and checking that the local APIC is hardware enabled is unnecessary
> and only works by sheer dumb luck.
OK makes sense :)
> The only reason kvm_create_lapic() stuffs the enable bit is to avoid toggling
> the static key, which incurs costly IPIs to patch kernel text. If
> apic_hw_disabled were to be removed (which is somewhat seriously being considered),
> this code would be deleted and TDX would break.
>
> /*
> * Stuff the APIC ENABLE bit in lieu of temporarily incrementing
> * apic_hw_disabled; the full RESET value is set by kvm_lapic_reset().
> */
> vcpu->arch.apic_base = MSR_IA32_APICBASE_ENABLE;
Thanks for the clarification. Updated patch below for reference in
case it's still needed.
Regards,
Tony
8< ----------------------
>From 1e4b72fe4a69f0bdd7c8379315b97be79fb6cf8a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tony Lindgren <tony.lindgren@...ux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 13:52:20 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] KVM/TDX: Use lapic_in_kernel() in tdx_vcpu_create()
Use lapic_in_kernel() in tdx_vcpu_create().
Suggested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony.lindgren@...ux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
index d0dc3200fa37..b905a7c9e2ff 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include "capabilities.h"
#include "mmu.h"
#include "x86_ops.h"
+#include "lapic.h"
#include "tdx.h"
#include "vmx.h"
#include "mmu/spte.h"
@@ -674,7 +675,7 @@ int tdx_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return -EIO;
/* TDX only supports x2APIC, which requires an in-kernel local APIC. */
- if (!vcpu->arch.apic)
+ if (!lapic_in_kernel(vcpu))
return -EINVAL;
fpstate_set_confidential(&vcpu->arch.guest_fpu);
--
2.47.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists