[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d1d2382f-f618-a318-579e-8318057fbf15@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 09:27:24 +0800
From: "lihuisong (C)" <lihuisong@...wei.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <jdelvare@...e.com>,
<liuyonglong@...wei.com>, <zhanjie9@...ilicon.com>, <zhenglifeng1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] hwmon: (acpi_power_meter) Fix uninitialized
variables
在 2025/1/8 22:45, Guenter Roeck 写道:
> On 1/7/25 03:33, Huisong Li wrote:
>> The 'power1_alarm' attribute uses the 'power' and 'cap' in the
>> acpi_power_meter_resource structure. Currently, these two fields are
>> just
>> updated when user query 'power' and 'cap' attribute. If user directly
>> query
>> the 'power1_alarm' attribute without queryng above two attributes,
>> driver
>> will use uninitialized variables to judge.
>>
>> So this patch adds the setting of alarm state and update 'cap' in the
>> notification callback and update 'power' and 'cap' if needed to show the
>> real alarm state.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c
>> b/drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c
>> index 2f1c9d97ad21..0b337d4fb212 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c
>> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ struct acpi_power_meter_resource {
>> u64 power;
>> u64 cap;
>> u64 avg_interval;
>> + bool power_alarm;
>> int sensors_valid;
>> unsigned long sensors_last_updated;
>> struct sensor_device_attribute sensors[NUM_SENSORS];
>> @@ -396,6 +397,9 @@ static ssize_t show_val(struct device *dev,
>> struct acpi_device *acpi_dev = to_acpi_device(dev);
>> struct acpi_power_meter_resource *resource =
>> acpi_dev->driver_data;
>> u64 val = 0;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + guard(mutex)(&resource->lock);
>> switch (attr->index) {
>> case 0:
>> @@ -423,10 +427,17 @@ static ssize_t show_val(struct device *dev,
>> val = 0;
>> break;
>> case 6:
>> - if (resource->power > resource->cap)
>> - val = 1;
>> - else
>> - val = 0;
>> + ret = update_meter(resource);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + /* need to update cap if not to support the notification. */
>> + if (!(resource->caps.flags & POWER_METER_CAN_NOTIFY)) {
>> + ret = update_cap(resource);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + val = resource->power_alarm || resource->power > resource->cap;
>> + resource->power_alarm = resource->power > resource->cap ?
>> true : false;
>
> The result of the comparison is already a boolean. ? : is unnecessary.
Right, will fix in v3.
>
>> break;
>> case 7:
>> case 8:
>> @@ -847,12 +858,20 @@ static void acpi_power_meter_notify(struct
>> acpi_device *device, u32 event)
>> sysfs_notify(&device->dev.kobj, NULL, POWER_AVERAGE_NAME);
>> break;
>> case METER_NOTIFY_CAP:
>> + mutex_lock(&resource->lock);
>> + res = update_cap(resource);
>> + if (res)
>> + dev_err(&device->dev, "update cap failed when capping
>> value is changed.\n");
>
> Please make this dev_err_once() to avoid logging noise if the problem
> is persistent.
will fix in v3.
Thanks.
>
>> + mutex_unlock(&resource->lock);
>> sysfs_notify(&device->dev.kobj, NULL, POWER_CAP_NAME);
>> break;
>> case METER_NOTIFY_INTERVAL:
>> sysfs_notify(&device->dev.kobj, NULL,
>> POWER_AVG_INTERVAL_NAME);
>> break;
>> case METER_NOTIFY_CAPPING:
>> + mutex_lock(&resource->lock);
>> + resource->power_alarm = true;
>> + mutex_unlock(&resource->lock);
>> sysfs_notify(&device->dev.kobj, NULL, POWER_ALARM_NAME);
>> dev_info(&device->dev, "Capping in progress.\n");
>> break;
>
> .
Powered by blists - more mailing lists