linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] sysfs: constify bin_attribute argument of sysfs_bin_attr_simple

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025010930-resurrect-attest-94c9@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 09:12:03 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
	Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
	Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
	Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
	Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
	Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
	bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] sysfs: constify bin_attribute argument of
 sysfs_bin_attr_simple_read()

On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 12:06:09AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 08:56:37AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > The "pointless" penalty will go away once we convert all instances, and
> > really, it's just one pointer check, sysfs files should NOT be a hot
> > path for anything real, and one more pointer check should be cached and
> > not measurable compared to the real logic behind the binary data coming
> > from the hardware/kernel, right?
> > 
> > sysfs is NOT tuned for speed at all, so adding more checks like this
> > should be fine.
> 
> Hey, when I duplicated the method to convert sysfs over to a proper
> seq_file based approach that avoids buffer overflows you basically
> came up with the same line that Alexei had here.

I did?  Sorry about that, I don't remember that.

> And that is a lot
> more useful than constification. Not that I mind the latter, but it
> would be better if it could be done without leaving both variants
> in for long.

I agree, we should get the read_new stuff out in the next kernel cycle I
hope.

As for seq_file for sysfs, is that for binary attributes only, or for
all?  I can't recall that at all.

thanks,

greg k-h