[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250109082812.136268-1-wenliang202407@163.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 16:28:12 +0800
From: Wenliang Yan <wenliang202407@....com>
To: linux@...ck-us.net,
krzk@...nel.org
Cc: conor+dt@...nel.org,
corbet@....net,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
jdelvare@...e.com,
krzk+dt@...nel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
robh@...nel.org,
wenliang202407@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings:Add SQ52206 to ina2xx devicetree bindings
At 2025-01-08 22:18:38, "Guenter Roeck" <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>On 1/7/25 23:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 07/01/2025 14:01, Wenliang Yan wrote:
>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ti,ina2xx.yaml | 1 +
>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ti,ina2xx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ti,ina2xx.yaml
>>>>> index 05a9cb36cd82..f0b7758ab29f 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ti,ina2xx.yaml
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ti,ina2xx.yaml
>>>>> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ description: |
>>>>> properties:
>>>>> compatible:
>>>>> enum:
>>>>> + - silergy,sq52206
>>>>
>>>> So it is compatible or not? You said same bindings, but not compatible?
>>>>
>>>
>>> What I mean is that SQ52206 is compatible.the datasheet depends on
>>
>>
>> Then compatibility should be expressed in fallback, but OTOH, your
>> linked changes suggest these are not compatible. Confusing commit msg.
>>
>
>It is 'backward compatible' with additional features. That means it is not
>'compatible' in devicetree terminology.
>
Thank you for your explanation.
Although SQ52206 has added some new features, it has not affected the
hardware properties.The properties described in the ina2xx.yaml are
applicable to the sq52206 hardware.
So I will just add the sq52206 compatible to the ina2xx.yaml.yaml
from that series. Would that be fine from your side?
Thanks,
Wenliang Yan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists