linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/93] 5.4.289-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025010900-camping-giggle-fbe2@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 11:12:21 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Muhammad Usama Anjum <Usama.Anjum@...labora.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
	patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
	jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
	sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
	conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/93] 5.4.289-rc1 review

On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 06:00:40PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> On 1/6/25 8:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.289 release.
> > There are 93 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Jan 2025 15:11:04 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.289-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> > 
> > -------------
> OVERVIEW
> 
>         Builds: 34 passed, 4 failed

Are these new failures?  Or old ones?  Knowing this would help out a
lot, thanks.

greg k-h