[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z3-lQ6oLSNe6t3sb@rric.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 11:30:27 +0100
From: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
To: Li Ming <ming.li@...omail.com>
Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>,
"Fabio M. De Francesco" <fabio.m.de.francesco@...ux.intel.com>,
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 08/29] cxl/region: Split region registration into an
initialization and adding part
Ming,
On 09.01.25 09:08:32, Li Ming wrote:
> On 1/7/2025 10:09 PM, Robert Richter wrote:
> > +int cxl_endpoint_register(struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled)
> > +{
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + rc = cxl_endpoint_initialize(cxled);
> > + if (rc)
> > + return rc;
> > +
> > + return cxl_endpoint_add(cxled);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_endpoint_register, "CXL");
>
> Hi Robert,
> cxl_endpoint_initialize(), cxl_endpoint_add(),
> cxl_endpoint_register() feels like some functions related to an
> endpoint, but I think they are for an endpoint decoder enabling,
> maybe rename them to
> cxl_endpoint_decoder_initialize()/add()/register()?
Yes, this handles the endpoint decoder. I noticed that too but kept
the short naming. Will rename it. This aligns then with other existing
cxl_endpoint_decoder_*() functions.
Thanks for review,
-Robert
Powered by blists - more mailing lists