[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250109105227.1012778-1-arnout@bzzt.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 11:52:27 +0100
From: Arnout Engelen <arnout@...t.net>
To: linux@...ssschuh.net
Cc: arnd@...db.de,
da.gomez@...sung.com,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
masahiroy@...nel.org,
mcgrof@...nel.org,
nathan@...nel.org,
nicolas@...sle.eu,
petr.pavlu@...e.com,
samitolvanen@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] module: Introduce hash-based integrity checking
On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 17:37:52 -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> What distro which is using module signatures would switch
> to this as an alternative instead?
In NixOS, we disable MODULE_SIG by default (because we value
reproducibility over having module signatures). Enabling
MODULE_HASHES on systems that do not need to load out-of-tree
modules would be a good step forward.
Kind regards,
Arnout Engelen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists