lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87sepsjm2y.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 12:52:37 +0200
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>, Thomas Hellström
 <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>, DRM XE List
 <intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next
 Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Matt Atwood
 <matthew.s.atwood@...el.com>, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@...el.com>, DRI
 <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-xe tree with Linus' tree

On Thu, 09 Jan 2025, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 18:38:01 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:09:21 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> >
>> > Today's linux-next merge of the drm-xe tree got a conflict in:
>> > 
>> >   include/drm/intel/xe_pciids.h
>> > 
>> > between commit:
>> > 
>> >   493454445c95 ("drm/xe: switch to common PCI ID macros")
>> > 
>> > from Linus' tree and commit:
>> > 
>> >   ae78ec0a52c4 ("drm/xe/ptl: Add another PTL PCI ID")
>> > 
>> > from the drm-xe tree.
>> > 
>> > I fixed it up (I deleted the file and added the following merge fix patch)
>> > and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
>> > is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
>> > upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
>> > also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
>> > tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>> > 
>> > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
>> > Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:05:38 +1100
>> > Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "drm/xe/ptl: Add another PTL PCI ID"
>> > 
>> > interacting with "drm/xe: switch to common PCI ID macros" from Linus'
>> > tree.
>> > ---
>> >  include/drm/intel/pciids.h | 3 ++-
>> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> > 
>> > diff --git a/include/drm/intel/pciids.h b/include/drm/intel/pciids.h
>> > index 32480b5563db..7883384acd5e 100644
>> > --- a/include/drm/intel/pciids.h
>> > +++ b/include/drm/intel/pciids.h
>> > @@ -829,6 +829,7 @@
>> >  	MACRO__(0xB092, ## __VA_ARGS__), \
>> >  	MACRO__(0xB0A0, ## __VA_ARGS__), \
>> >  	MACRO__(0xB0A1, ## __VA_ARGS__), \
>> > -	MACRO__(0xB0A2, ## __VA_ARGS__)
>> > +	MACRO__(0xB0A2, ## __VA_ARGS__), \
>> > +	MACRO__(0xB0B0, ## __VA_ARGS__)
>> >  
>> >  #endif /* __PCIIDS_H__ */
>> > -- 
>> > 2.45.2  
>> 
>> OK, so commits ae78ec0a52c4 and 493454445c95 were merged in commit
>> 
>>   8f109f287fdc ("Merge drm/drm-next into drm-xe-next")
>> 
>> but include/drm/intel/xe_pciids.h was not deleted (it is not longer
>> referenced anywhere in the tree) and the above patch was not applied :-(
>> 
>> Since then that part of the drm-xe tree has been merged into the drm
>> tree in commit
>> 
>>   bdecb30d579e ("Merge tag 'drm-xe-next-2024-12-11' of https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel into drm-next")
>> 
>> So, include/drm/intel/xe_pciids.h needs to be removed from the drm tree
>> and the above patch applied there.
>
> Ping?

Thanks for the ping. See [1].

BR,
Jani.


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109105032.2585416-1-jani.nikula@intel.com


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ