[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250109111434.GB15384@strace.io>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 13:14:34 +0200
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...ace.io>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@...il.com>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
Renzo Davoli <renzo@...unibo.it>,
Davide Berardi <berardi.dav@...il.com>,
strace-devel@...ts.strace.io, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] ptrace_get_syscall_info: factor out
ptrace_get_syscall_info_op
On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 11:41:47AM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 01/08, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> >
> > +ptrace_get_syscall_info_op(struct task_struct *child)
> > {
> ...
> > case SIGTRAP | 0x80:
> > switch (child->ptrace_message) {
> > case PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY:
> > - actual_size = ptrace_get_syscall_info_entry(child, regs,
> > - &info);
> > - break;
> > + return PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_ENTRY;
> > case PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_EXIT:
> > - actual_size = ptrace_get_syscall_info_exit(child, regs,
> > - &info);
> > - break;
> > + return PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_EXIT;
> > }
> > break;
> > case SIGTRAP | (PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP << 8):
> > - actual_size = ptrace_get_syscall_info_seccomp(child, regs,
> > - &info);
> > + return PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_SECCOMP;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_NONE;
>
> Cosmetic, I won't insist, but I'd suggest to do
>
> default:
> return PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_SECCOMP;
> }
>
> to make it more symmetric.
OK, but I suppose you mean PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_NONE here, though.
--
ldv
Powered by blists - more mailing lists