[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250109121102.GA16212@strace.io>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 14:11:02 +0200
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...ace.io>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@...il.com>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
Renzo Davoli <renzo@...unibo.it>,
Davide Berardi <berardi.dav@...il.com>,
strace-devel@...ts.strace.io, Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Brian Cain <bcain@...cinc.com>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>, linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] syscall.h: add syscall_set_arguments() on remaining
HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK arches
On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 01:04:53PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 01/08, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> >
> > arch/arc/include/asm/syscall.h | 14 +++++++++
> > arch/arm/include/asm/syscall.h | 13 ++++++++
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h | 13 ++++++++
> > arch/csky/include/asm/syscall.h | 13 ++++++++
> > arch/hexagon/include/asm/syscall.h | 7 +++++
> > arch/loongarch/include/asm/syscall.h | 8 +++++
> > arch/mips/include/asm/syscall.h | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/parisc/include/asm/syscall.h | 12 ++++++++
>
> Confused... arch/x86 needs syscall_set_arguments() too ?
Sure, all HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK architectures need them, but most of these
architectures already provide them since the previous patch in the series:
[PATCH 1/6] Revert "arch: remove unused function syscall_set_arguments()"
--
ldv
Powered by blists - more mailing lists