[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8d856a0e-9226-405d-857a-35c2807e35fe@ursulin.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 12:56:03 +0000
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>
To: Adrián Larumbe <adrian.larumbe@...labora.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: kernel@...labora.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] Documentation/gpu: Clarify format of
driver-specific fidnfo keys
On 08/01/2025 21:02, Adrián Larumbe wrote:
> This change reflects de facto usage by amdgpu, as exemplified by commit
> d6530c33a978 ("drm/amdgpu: expose more memory stats in fdinfo").
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrián Larumbe <adrian.larumbe@...labora.com>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>
> ---
> Documentation/gpu/drm-usage-stats.rst | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/drm-usage-stats.rst b/Documentation/gpu/drm-usage-stats.rst
> index 2717cb2a597e..2b5393ed7692 100644
> --- a/Documentation/gpu/drm-usage-stats.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/gpu/drm-usage-stats.rst
> @@ -21,7 +21,10 @@ File format specification
>
> - File shall contain one key value pair per one line of text.
> - Colon character (`:`) must be used to delimit keys and values.
> -- All keys shall be prefixed with `drm-`.
> +- All standardised keys shall be prefixed with `drm-`.
> +- Driver-specific keys shall be prefixed with `driver_name-`, where
> + driver_name should ideally be the same as the `name` field in
> + `struct drm_driver`, although this is not mandatory.
> - Whitespace between the delimiter and first non-whitespace character shall be
> ignored when parsing.
> - Keys are not allowed to contain whitespace characters.
LGTM, thanks for documenting it!
Acked-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...lia.com>
Native english speaker maybe could clarify if s/Driver-specific/Driver
specific/ would be more correct.
Regards,
Tvrtko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists