[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025011026-apply-jacket-e262@gregkh>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 16:01:57 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Dave Penkler <dpenkler@...il.com>
Cc: linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: gpib: Add missing mutex unlock on early
return in
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 06:41:58PM +0100, Dave Penkler wrote:
> When no matching product id was found in the attach function the driver
> returned without unlocking the agilent_82357a_hotplug_lock mutex.
>
> Add the unlock call.
>
> This was detected by smatch:
> smatch warnings:
> drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82357a/agilent_82357a.c:1381 agilent_82357a_attach() warn: inconsistent returns 'global &agilent_82357a_hotplug_lock'.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202412210143.WJhYzXfD-lkp@intel.com/
> Fixes: 4c41fe886a56 ("staging: gpib: Add Agilent/Keysight 82357x USB GPIB driver")
> Signed-off-by: Dave Penkler <dpenkler@...il.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2 Add subsystem prefix in subject
You sent 2 patches with identical subject lines, yet they do different
things. That's not good, can you fix them both up and resend?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists