linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH printk v1 2/2] printk: Defer legacy printing when holding printk_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z4E9I-Pe1ylet0s4@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 16:30:43 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>, Omar Sandoval <osandov@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH printk v1 2/2] printk: Defer legacy printing when holding
 printk_cpu_sync

On Fri 2025-01-10 12:28:12, John Ogness wrote:
> Hi Petr,
> 
> On 2024-12-16, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
> > JFYI, the patchset has been committed into printk/linux.git,
> > branch for-6.14-cpu_sync-fixup.
> 
> I noticed that series is not yet merged into the printk/linux.git
> "for-6.14" branch. This email is just a ping so that you do not forget
> it for the upcoming merge window. ;-)

All is fine. This patchset has been in linux-next since Dec 16.
And I am going to include it in the pull request for 6.14.

The branch "for-6.14" is intended only for simple fixes.
This patchset is committed into the separate "topic" branch
"for-6.14-cpu_sync-fixup".

Both branches are merged into "for-next" branch separately.

I am sorry for confusion but I have never merged the topic
branches into "for-<version>" ones.

Best Regards,
Petr