[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z4Fil63TcgIgzwtx@google.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 10:10:31 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: make WARN_ON_FPU get fully optimized out
On Thu, Dec 26, 2024, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
>
> Currently WARN_ON_FPU evaluates its argument even if
> CONFIG_X86_DEBUG_FPU is disabled, which adds unnecessary instructions to
> several functions. Fix this by making the argument evaluation in the
> no-debug case conditional on if (0), similar to what no_printk() does.
>
> Fixes: 83242c515881 ("x86/fpu: Make WARN_ON_FPU() more robust in the !CONFIG_X86_DEBUG_FPU case")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/fpu/internal.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/internal.h
> index dbdb31f55fc7..deb0a31b75e4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/internal.h
> @@ -16,11 +16,11 @@ static __always_inline __pure bool use_fxsr(void)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_DEBUG_FPU
> # define WARN_ON_FPU(x) WARN_ON_ONCE(x)
> #else
> -# define WARN_ON_FPU(x) ({ (void)(x); 0; })
> +# define WARN_ON_FPU(x) ({ if (0) (void)(x); 0; })
BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID() already takes care of this, e.g. I verified this also makes
the code generation go away:
# define WARN_ON_FPU(x) ({ BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(x); 0; })
> #endif
>
> /* Used in init.c */
> extern void fpstate_init_user(struct fpstate *fpstate);
> extern void fpstate_reset(struct fpu *fpu);
>
> base-commit: d6ef8b40d075c425f548002d2f35ae3f06e9cf96
> --
> 2.47.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists