lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <szkkdk35keb6ibdy2d2p2q6qiykeo2aoj2iqpzx3h6k2wzs2ob@iuidkwpeoxua>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 10:23:17 +0200
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Kevin Loughlin <kevinloughlin@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, 
	bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, 
	seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, kai.huang@...el.com, ubizjak@...il.com, 
	dave.jiang@...el.com, jgross@...e.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, thomas.lendacky@....com, 
	pgonda@...gle.com, sidtelang@...gle.com, mizhang@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com, 
	szy0127@...u.edu.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: SEV: Prefer WBNOINVD over WBINVD for cache
 maintenance efficiency

On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 10:55:33PM +0000, Kevin Loughlin wrote:
> @@ -710,6 +711,14 @@ static void sev_clflush_pages(struct page *pages[], unsigned long npages)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void sev_wb_on_all_cpus(void)
> +{
> +	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_WBNOINVD))
> +		wbnoinvd_on_all_cpus();
> +	else
> +		wbinvd_on_all_cpus();

I think the X86_FEATURE_WBNOINVD check should be inside wbnoinvd().
wbnoinvd() should fallback to WBINVD if the instruction is not supported
rather than trigger #UD.

-- 
  Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ