[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a5fttl5su6nqfnq7rs275tp3gpxauqacebacehxm7jj32dga4@tucnr4wkqnd5>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 09:35:12 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: PavithraUdayakumar-adi <pavithra.u@...log.com>
Cc: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@...log.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: rtc: max31335: Add max31331 support
On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 03:59:57PM +0530, PavithraUdayakumar-adi wrote:
> MAX31331 is an ultra-low-power, I2C Real-Time Clock RTC with flexible
> crystal support. While, MAX31335 offers higher precision, MEMS resonator,
> and integrated temperature sensor. MAX31331 uses I2C address as 0x68
> where as max31335 uses 0x69.
>
> Changes: Added example for max31331 and modified the register address
> for max31335.
1. Why?
2. What does it mean "changes"? You did much more so I really do not
understand this paragraph.
>
> Signed-off-by: PavithraUdayakumar-adi <pavithra.u@...log.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/rtc/adi,max31335.yaml | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
What changed here exactly?
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/adi,max31335.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/adi,max31335.yaml
> index 0125cf6727cc3d9eb3e0253299904ee363ec40ca..f249313bc485d7a6154ce684726d6a950405ef0e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/adi,max31335.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/adi,max31335.yaml
> @@ -18,10 +18,13 @@ allOf:
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> - const: adi,max31335
> + enum:
> + - adi,max31331
> + - adi,max31335
>
> reg:
> - maxItems: 1
> + items:
> + - enum: [0x68, 0x69]
>
> interrupts:
> maxItems: 1
> @@ -57,9 +60,9 @@ examples:
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
>
> - rtc@68 {
> + rtc@69 {
> compatible = "adi,max31335";
> - reg = <0x68>;
> + reg = <0x69>;
Why? I already asked about this - the same question "Why"
> pinctrl-0 = <&rtc_nint_pins>;
> interrupts-extended = <&gpio1 16 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> aux-voltage-chargeable = <1>;
> @@ -67,4 +70,15 @@ examples:
> adi,tc-diode = "schottky";
> };
> };
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> + i2c {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + rtc@68 {
> + reg = <0x68>;
> + compatible = "adi,max31331";
Drop this example, not necessary.
> + };
> + };
> ...
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists