[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72=Cfb4eXCd7-GLJEG7+Na1+ng1mbs0eYgaDDyLDf8phpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 11:08:08 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rust tree
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 10:41 AM Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> You can take it as a real patch. That will make your tree compile both
> with and without rust-next merged.
I don't think it builds without `rust-next` since the tree does not
have `build_error!` imported (from the prelude).
Greg: if you want to pick it as a patch, please do instead:
- kernel::build_error(VTABLE_DEFAULT_ERROR)
+ kernel::build_error!(VTABLE_DEFAULT_ERROR).
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists