[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250110-amiable-impartial-chinchilla-0dc0ae-mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 11:13:31 +0100
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: can-transceiver: Drop unnecessary "mux-states"
property presence check
On 31.12.2024 10:32:51, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> It doesn't matter whether "mux-states" is not present or there is some
> other issue parsing it causing an error. Drop the presence check and
> rework the error handling to ignore anything other than deferred probe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c | 14 ++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c b/drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c
> index ee4ce4249698..ed8ba30eb038 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ static int can_transceiver_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct phy *phy;
> struct gpio_desc *standby_gpio;
> struct gpio_desc *enable_gpio;
> + struct mux_state *mux_state;
> u32 max_bitrate = 0;
> int err;
>
> @@ -113,15 +114,12 @@ static int can_transceiver_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> match = of_match_node(can_transceiver_phy_ids, pdev->dev.of_node);
> drvdata = match->data;
>
> - if (of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "mux-states")) {
> - struct mux_state *mux_state;
> -
> - mux_state = devm_mux_state_get(dev, NULL);
> - if (IS_ERR(mux_state))
> - return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(mux_state),
> - "failed to get mux\n");
> + mux_state = devm_mux_state_get(dev, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(mux_state)) {
> + if (PTR_ERR(mux_state) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + return PTR_ERR(mux_state);
> + } else
> can_transceiver_phy->mux_state = mux_state;
> - }
Nitpick:
I think we want { } on both sides of the if/else.
After fixing this:
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
>
> phy = devm_phy_create(dev, dev->of_node,
> &can_transceiver_phy_ops);
> --
regards,
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung Nürnberg | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists