lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250110-married-program-83bc1a997ce8@thorsis.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 11:40:26 +0100
From: Alexander Dahl <ada@...rsis.com>
To: Csókás, Bence <csokas.bence@...lan.hu>,
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
	Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
	Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
	Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
	Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] spi: atmel-quadspi: Add support for sama7g5 QSPI

Hello,

Am Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 05:27:58PM +0100 schrieb Alexander Dahl:
> Hello Bence,
> 
> I had another round of intense looking at the code, this time I
> focused on pm_runtime handling.  Although I just learned about the
> basic concepts, I think the ported patch has some mistakes.  I'll
> comment here, because I don't have a SAMA7G5 to test, and I'm not
> confident enough to fix the code, but I think it's worth reporting.
> See below.
> 
> Am Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 06:43:15PM +0100 schrieb Csókás, Bence:
> > From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
> > 

[…]

> > +	/* Release the chip-select. */
> > +	ret = atmel_qspi_reg_sync(aq);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&aq->pdev->dev);
> > +		pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&aq->pdev->dev);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +	atmel_qspi_write(QSPI_CR_LASTXFER, aq, QSPI_CR);
> > +
> > +	return atmel_qspi_wait_for_completion(aq, QSPI_SR_CSRA);
> > +}
> 
> This function atmel_qspi_sama7g5_transfer() seems to be called from
> atmel_qspi_exec_op() through ops->transfer() only.  I think the two
> lines in the error handling of atmel_qspi_reg_sync() lead to
> unbalanced calls of pm_runtime_xxx.  Compare with
> atmel_qspi_transfer() which has no calls to pm_runtime, everything is
> covered by atmel_qspi_exec_op() in this case where the pm_runtime
> calls surround ->set_cfg() and ->transfer().  Right?

This problem has been addressed in downstream kernel (linux4sam) by
Claudiu Beznea back in 2023 already:

https://github.com/linux4sam/linux-at91/commit/e59f646f516088fdab6d8213d8acda0c1063ec21

[…]

> The whole call tree from atmel_qspi_sama7g5_setup() downwards is not
> covered by pm_runtime get and put calls, although heavily doing i/o.
> Further down in atmel_qspi_setup() there's a write to QSPI_SCR which
> seems to be handled correctly.

Same for this:

https://github.com/linux4sam/linux-at91/commit/5ff0e74c1d548599fe85113e2f1817cb8a052b15

Some hunks of that seem to have made it to upstream, not sure?

Maybe Microchip should upstream those fixes, now that SAMA7G5 support
was ported to mainline?

Greets
Alex

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ