[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2e240422-b964-42ce-b537-413b1d8ae07d@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 13:28:13 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Pengyu Luo <mitltlatltl@...il.com>,
Bjorn Andersson
<andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: correct usb phy power supply
On 10.01.2025 10:23 AM, Pengyu Luo wrote:
> On this platform, according to dsdt tables, usb{0,1} phy consume the
> following regulators. usb2 phy should be corrected also, usb2 in dsdt
> is a little complicated, so correct usb{0,1} only for now.
>
> usb0 usb1 voltage consumer
> hsphy:
> l1c l1c 1.8v vdda18-supply
> l9d l4b 0.912v vdda-pll-supply
> l7d l13c 3.072v vdda33-supply
> qmpphy:
> l4d l3b 1.2v vdda-phy-supply
> l6d l6b 0.88v vdda-pll-supply
Looking at the CRD schematics, it should instead be:
USB0 USB1 VOLT NAME
L1B L8D 0.9ish PHY
L4D L4D 1.2 PLL
I'm hoping I'm reading those right, it's not super obvious
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists