linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs: introduce getfsxattrat and setfsxattrat syscalls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202501112052.ZJEvfjhd-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2025 21:07:51 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
	Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@...hat.com>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	monstr@...str.eu, mpe@...erman.id.au, npiggin@...il.com,
	christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, naveen@...nel.org, maddy@...ux.ibm.com,
	luto@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
	dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
	chris@...kel.net, jcmvbkbc@...il.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	brauner@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz, arnd@...db.de,
	linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: introduce getfsxattrat and setfsxattrat syscalls

Hi Andrey,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on brauner-vfs/vfs.all]
[also build test WARNING on geert-m68k/for-next powerpc/next powerpc/fixes s390/features linus/master v6.13-rc6 next-20250110]
[cannot apply to geert-m68k/for-linus deller-parisc/for-next jcmvbkbc-xtensa/xtensa-for-next arnd-asm-generic/master tip/x86/asm]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Andrey-Albershteyn/fs-introduce-getfsxattrat-and-setfsxattrat-syscalls/20250110-014739
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git vfs.all
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109174540.893098-1-aalbersh%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH] fs: introduce getfsxattrat and setfsxattrat syscalls
config: arm-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250111/202501112052.ZJEvfjhd-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250111/202501112052.ZJEvfjhd-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501112052.ZJEvfjhd-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> <stdin>:1615:2: warning: syscall getfsxattrat not implemented [-W#warnings]
    1615 | #warning syscall getfsxattrat not implemented
         |  ^
>> <stdin>:1618:2: warning: syscall setfsxattrat not implemented [-W#warnings]
    1618 | #warning syscall setfsxattrat not implemented
         |  ^
   2 warnings generated.
--
>> <stdin>:1615:2: warning: syscall getfsxattrat not implemented [-W#warnings]
    1615 | #warning syscall getfsxattrat not implemented
         |  ^
>> <stdin>:1618:2: warning: syscall setfsxattrat not implemented [-W#warnings]
    1618 | #warning syscall setfsxattrat not implemented
         |  ^
   2 warnings generated.

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki