linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the vfs-brauner tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250110163129.41c9e343fe772fd194242d70@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 16:31:29 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the vfs-brauner tree

On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 12:08:04 +0100 Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org> wrote:

> > > from the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch of the mm-hotfixes tree.
> > 
> > I'll drop the mm.git copies.
> > 
> > Christian,
> > 
> > hp2:/usr/src/mm> git log fs/proc | grep "Signed.*akpm" | wc -l 
> > 1231
> > 
> > if you wish to change this then please discuss with me.
> 
> Ah sorry, I just saw this message now.
> Sorry, since fs/proc/ is just listed as fsdevel I picked them up.
> I'm happy to take them going forward unless it has obvious interactions
> with mm.

I'd like to keep procfs in mm.git please.  And yes, there's often
interaction with mm/.  And with quite a range of other subsystems -
things which have a presence in /proc.