[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <619bfa123308eeb3a548fae36a3f9e4c@she-devel.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2025 10:55:55 -0800
From: Alison Chaiken <alison@...-devel.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: corbet@....net, gratian.crisan@...com, triegel@...hat.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, achaiken@...ora.tech
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: locking: update libc support status of PI
futexes
On 2025-01-07 07:31, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2024-12-28 10:15:46 [-0800], alison@...-devel.com wrote:
>> From: Alison Chaiken <alison@...-devel.com>
>>
>> Update the text of futex-requeue-pi.rst to explain that, because of a
>> conflict between POSIX requirements and ABI constraints, glibc does
>> not support requeueing of PI futexes. Add some information about
>> librtpi, a library which provides an implementation of condition
>> variables which supports priority inheritance.
>
> Are you sure? My memory is that glibc avoided using the internal mutex.
> The old problem should be gone and pthread_cond_signal() and
> pthread_cond_wait() should work.
Ignoring support for 64-bit time, the last substantive change to
pthread_cond_wait() and pthread_cond_signal() was Torvald Riegel's
commit ed19993b5b0d05d62cc883571519a67dae481a14 "New condvar
implementation that provides stronger ordering guarantees," which fixed
problems with waking of ineligible futex waiters and with ABA issues
concerning the futex word. What the patch does not do is made clear
by the commit message:
This condvar doesn't yet use a requeue optimization (ie, on a
broadcast,
waking just one thread and requeueing all others on the futex of
the
mutex supplied by the program).
What futex-requeue-pi.rst directs is
In order to support PI-aware pthread_condvar's, the kernel needs to
be able to requeue tasks to PI futexes.
Riegel and Darren Hart discussed Riegel's patch in at length at the 2016
RT Summit:
https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/realtime/events/rt-summit2016/schedule
The related glibc bug report by Darren may be found at
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11588
The last comment on the bug from 2017 is by Riegel:
So far, there is no known solution for how to achieve PI support
given the current constraints we have (eg, available futex operations,
POSIX requirements, ...).
I ran the bug reproducer posted by Darren in Qemu and found that it did
not fail. I'm not sure if the result is valid given the peculiarities
of Qemu, or whether I made some other mistake.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Alison Chaiken <alison@...-devel.com>
>
> Sebastian
-- Alison Chaiken
Aurora Innovation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists