[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGudoHH6TKX8EnoK2aSSBc_4EKgOWV=bRAqreFWbEqBJL5RcKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2025 21:31:31 +0100
From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org, willy@...radead.org,
liam.howlett@...cle.com, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
david.laight.linux@...il.com, mhocko@...e.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
hannes@...xchg.org, oliver.sang@...el.com, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
david@...hat.com, peterx@...hat.com, oleg@...hat.com, dave@...olabs.net,
paulmck@...nel.org, brauner@...nel.org, dhowells@...hat.com, hdanton@...a.com,
hughd@...gle.com, lokeshgidra@...gle.com, minchan@...gle.com,
jannh@...gle.com, shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, souravpanda@...gle.com,
pasha.tatashin@...een.com, klarasmodin@...il.com, richard.weiyang@...il.com,
corbet@....net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 11/17] mm: replace vm_lock and detached flag with a
reference count
On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 9:14 PM Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 3:24 AM Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com> wrote:
> > The previous modification of this spot to raw_read_seqcount loses the
> > acquire fence, making the above comment not line up with the code.
>
> Is it? From reading the seqcount code
> (https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.13-rc3/source/include/linux/seqlock.h#L211):
>
> raw_read_seqcount()
> seqprop_sequence()
> __seqprop(s, sequence)
> __seqprop_sequence()
> smp_load_acquire()
>
> smp_load_acquire() still provides the acquire fence. Am I missing something?
>
That's fine indeed.
In a different project there is an equivalent API which skips
barriers, too quick glance suggested this is what's going on here. My
bad, sorry for false alarm on this front. :)
--
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik gmail.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists