[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250111010409.1252942-5-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 17:04:08 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] KVM: Check for empty mask of harvested dirty ring entries
in caller
When resetting a dirty ring, explicitly check that there is work to be
done before calling kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(), e.g. if no harvested entries
are found and/or on the loop's first iteration, and delete the extremely
misleading comment "This is only needed to make compilers happy". KVM
absolutely relies on mask to be zero-initialized, i.e. the comment is an
outright lie. Furthermore, the compiler is right to complain that KVM is
calling a function with uninitialized data, as there are no guarantees
the implementation details of kvm_reset_dirty_gfn() will be visible to
kvm_dirty_ring_reset().
While the flaw could be fixed by simply deleting (or rewording) the
comment, and duplicating the check is unfortunate, checking mask in the
caller will allow for additional cleanups.
Opportunisticaly drop the zero-initialization of cur_slot and cur_offset.
If a bug were introduced where either the slot or offset was consumed
before mask is set to a non-zero value, then it is highly desirable for
the compiler (or some other sanitizer) to yell.
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c b/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c
index 37eb2b7142bd..95ab0e3cf9da 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c
@@ -55,9 +55,6 @@ static void kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, u32 slot, u64 offset, u64 mask)
struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
int as_id, id;
- if (!mask)
- return;
-
as_id = slot >> 16;
id = (u16)slot;
@@ -109,13 +106,10 @@ int kvm_dirty_ring_reset(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_dirty_ring *ring,
{
u32 cur_slot, next_slot;
u64 cur_offset, next_offset;
- unsigned long mask;
+ unsigned long mask = 0;
struct kvm_dirty_gfn *entry;
bool first_round = true;
- /* This is only needed to make compilers happy */
- cur_slot = cur_offset = mask = 0;
-
while (likely((*nr_entries_reset) < INT_MAX)) {
if (signal_pending(current))
return -EINTR;
@@ -163,14 +157,31 @@ int kvm_dirty_ring_reset(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_dirty_ring *ring,
continue;
}
}
- kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(kvm, cur_slot, cur_offset, mask);
+
+ /*
+ * Reset the slot for all the harvested entries that have been
+ * gathered, but not yet fully processed.
+ */
+ if (mask)
+ kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(kvm, cur_slot, cur_offset, mask);
+
+ /*
+ * The current slot was reset or this is the first harvested
+ * entry, (re)initialize the metadata.
+ */
cur_slot = next_slot;
cur_offset = next_offset;
mask = 1;
first_round = false;
}
- kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(kvm, cur_slot, cur_offset, mask);
+ /*
+ * Perform a final reset if there are harvested entries that haven't
+ * been processed. The loop only performs a reset when an entry can't
+ * be coalesced, i.e. always leaves at least one entry pending.
+ */
+ if (mask)
+ kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(kvm, cur_slot, cur_offset, mask);
/*
* The request KVM_REQ_DIRTY_RING_SOFT_FULL will be cleared
--
2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists