[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ac337470d5af8b70458c9bb7981f137b7cdce1ec.camel@surriel.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2025 21:36:54 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, nadav.amit@...il.com,
zhengqi.arch@...edance.com, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] x86/mm: enable broadcast TLB invalidation for
multi-threaded processes
On Mon, 2025-01-06 at 10:40 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 12/30/24 09:53, Rik van Riel wrote:
> ...
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD
> > + struct list_head broadcast_asid_list;
> > + u16 broadcast_asid;
> > + bool asid_transition;
> > +#endif
>
> Could we either do:
>
> config X86_TLB_FLUSH_BROADCAST_HW
> bool
> depends on CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD
I went with this option.
I also got rid of the list_head (thanks Nadav), and
moved the remaining two items into the same word as
the protection key bits.
I think I have everybody's comments addressed in my
code base now. I'll post a new version soon-ish :)
--
All Rights Reversed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists