linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] i2c: riic: driver cleanup and improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75Vfwpt2sBryu3zfPp9xWnHX7MkogYdoCVqpp9weWRaWDxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 16:31:20 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
Cc: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>, Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@...esas.com>, 
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>, 
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>, 
	Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>, 
	Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] i2c: riic: driver cleanup and improvements

On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 4:27 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 4:44 PM Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 04, 2025 at 08:15:56AM +0000, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 11:54 PM Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > I will need for Andy's ack here because he had some comments.
> > > >
> > > I'll have to respin the series fixing patch 1/9.
> >
> > if you want you can only send patch 1. It's OK as far as I'm
> > aware of it ;-)
> >
> > I pinged Andy privately to give an ack here, we still have a few
> > days to the merge window.
>
> Sorry for the delay, I have got sick just at the end of my vacation
> (and I still have a couple of days left), but I looked at the v4 and
> most of the patches LGTM, the respective comments are in the
> individual replies.

Okay, seems the main concern over v4/v5 is that vdso/* inclusions
while they should be linux/* ones. Otherwise LGTM. Since there are a
few changes required I would expect a v6 soon.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko