[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vd2-7M=rej2k_067KosvvSZ+8ZVvwszhabmKzY7qw_KrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 16:33:47 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc: Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@...esas.com>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] i2c: riic: Introduce a separate variable for IRQ
On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 11:12 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
>
> Refactor the IRQ handling in riic_i2c_probe by introducing a local variable
> `irq` to store IRQ numbers instead of assigning them to `ret`. This change
> improves code readability and clarity.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Andi, perhaps you may apply this one to reduce potential confusion /
ambiguity with v5 numbering and Prabhakar can then be focused on the
rest.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists