[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <78f3ae1f68842a9d1af62caaac3929834ce6ecfa.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 15:56:39 +0100
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Arnd Bergmann
<arnd@...db.de>, Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@...aro.org>, Matt
Turner <mattst88@...il.com>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, "Paul E.
McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michael Cree
<mcree@...on.net.nz>, Sam James <sam@...too.org>, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Michael Karcher
<kernel@...rcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de>, Chris Hofstaedtler
<zeha@...ian.org>, util-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] alpha/elf: Fix misc/setarch test of util-linux by
removing 32bit support
On Sun, 2025-01-12 at 14:40 +0000, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jan 2025, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>
> > > the EF_ALPHA_32BIT flag set. Just to fail explicitly in case someone
> > > somewhere has binaries that trying to use alpha's 32bit pointer
> > ^^^ are
>
> If nitpicking, I'd say just "try".
No objection. I was just hinting at obvious grammar mistakes. ;-)
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Powered by blists - more mailing lists