linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 08/12] x86/mm: use broadcast TLB flushing for page reclaim TLB flushing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250112155453.1104139-9-riel@surriel.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:53:52 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
To: x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	bp@...en8.de,
	peterz@...radead.org,
	dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
	zhengqi.arch@...edance.com,
	nadav.amit@...il.com,
	thomas.lendacky@....com,
	kernel-team@...a.com,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	jannh@...gle.com,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 08/12] x86/mm: use broadcast TLB flushing for page reclaim TLB flushing

In the page reclaim code, we only track the CPU(s) where the TLB needs
to be flushed, rather than all the individual mappings that may be getting
invalidated.

Use broadcast TLB flushing when that is available.

Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
---
 arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 56634c735351..b47d6c3fe0af 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -1319,7 +1319,9 @@ void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
 	 * a local TLB flush is needed. Optimize this use-case by calling
 	 * flush_tlb_func_local() directly in this case.
 	 */
-	if (cpumask_any_but(&batch->cpumask, cpu) < nr_cpu_ids) {
+	if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_INVLPGB)) {
+		invlpgb_flush_all_nonglobals();
+	} else if (cpumask_any_but(&batch->cpumask, cpu) < nr_cpu_ids) {
 		flush_tlb_multi(&batch->cpumask, info);
 	} else if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &batch->cpumask)) {
 		lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
-- 
2.47.1