linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] iio: adc: ad7380: do not use iio_device_claim_direct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z4Pt9oZEkfQMuYUm@surfacebook.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 18:29:42 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Julien Stephan <jstephan@...libre.com>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
	Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
	David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] iio: adc: ad7380: do not use
 iio_device_claim_direct_scoped anymore

Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 01:49:33PM +0100, Julien Stephan kirjoitti:
> Conditionnal scoped handlers are turning out to be a real pain:
> readability issues, compiler and linker handling issues among others so
> rollback and remove the scoped version of iio_dvice_claim_direct_mode.

Is it IIO level decision or you as a contributor to/maintainer of this driver?
If the former? can you add a Link to the discussion?

Otherwise, I would like to understand the common approach / practices in IIO
WRT individual drivers to deviate the common approaches. Jonathan?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko