[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <954725b5-5d53-4bd0-9a06-61ac1aa35dfe@icloud.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 23:00:12 +0800
From: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@...oud.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, Maxime Ripard
<mripard@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann@...xeda.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Oreoluwa Babatunde <quic_obabatun@...cinc.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/14] of: Improve __of_add_property_sysfs()
readability
On 2025/1/11 04:41, Rob Herring wrote:
>> From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
>>
>> __of_add_property_sysfs() hard codes string "security-" length as 9, but
>> that is not obvious for readers.
>>
>> Improve its readability by using strlen().
> Does the compiler optimize the strlen call away? Maybe, maybe not. If
> not, that's N calls to strlen() where N is the number of properties in
> your DT. That's in the 1000s easily.
>
> Do you really want to go test enough compiler versions we support to
> feel confident this is optimized away. I don't.
i understand your concern about performance.
what about below solution ?
int __of_add_property_sysfs(struct device_node *np, struct property *pp)
{
+#define SECURITY_PREFIX "security-"
int rc;
/* Important: Don't leak passwords */
- bool secure = strncmp(pp->name, "security-", 9) == 0;
+ bool secure = strncmp(pp->name, SECURITY_PREFIX,
sizeof(SECURITY_PREFIX) - 1) == 0;
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYSFS))
return 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists