[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025011343-cannon-sprawl-f0e0@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:19:50 +0100
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iio tree with the
char-misc.current tree
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 02:23:42PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 15:21:07 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the iio tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1119.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 54d394905c92 ("iio: adc: ti-ads1119: fix sample size in scan struct for triggered buffer")
> >
> > from the char-misc.current tree and commit:
> >
> > 2cfb4cd058d0 ("iio: adc: Use aligned_s64 instead of open coding alignment.")
> >
> > from the iio tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell
> >
> > diff --cc drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1119.c
> > index c268e27eec12,0a68ecdea4e6..000000000000
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1119.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1119.c
> > @@@ -500,8 -500,8 +500,8 @@@ static irqreturn_t ads1119_trigger_hand
> > struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev;
> > struct ads1119_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > struct {
> > - unsigned int sample;
> > + s16 sample;
> > - s64 timestamp __aligned(8);
> > + aligned_s64 timestamp;
> > } scan;
> > unsigned int index;
> > int ret;
>
> This is now a conflict between the char-misc tree and Linus' tree.
>
Thanks, now resolved in my tree.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists