[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <996c7843-7f51-49a0-9122-e688e37f9902@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 17:02:24 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
oliver.upton@...ux.dev, suzuki.poulose@....com,
coresight@...ts.linaro.org, James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>, Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
"Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>,
Shiqi Liu <shiqiliu@...t.edu.cn>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 04/10] arm64/sysreg: Add a comment that the sysreg
file should be sorted
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 04:49:49PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org> wrote:
> > I think it's ok if it avoids review comments that new entries should
> > be sorted. Or maybe we do the opposite and the comment should say this
> > file is allowed to be unsorted...
> The better option would be to add the comment *and* sort the file.
> Leading by example has some value, it seems.
Yes, please.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists