[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpG3OMHpBg5BFcXH5935aYD9v7ON8dQrHr1t9HS3m_htvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 13:16:41 -0800
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org, willy@...radead.org,
liam.howlett@...cle.com, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
david.laight.linux@...il.com, mhocko@...e.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
hannes@...xchg.org, mjguzik@...il.com, oliver.sang@...el.com,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net, david@...hat.com, peterx@...hat.com,
oleg@...hat.com, dave@...olabs.net, paulmck@...nel.org, brauner@...nel.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, hdanton@...a.com, hughd@...gle.com,
lokeshgidra@...gle.com, minchan@...gle.com, jannh@...gle.com,
shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, souravpanda@...gle.com, pasha.tatashin@...een.com,
klarasmodin@...il.com, corbet@....net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 11/17] mm: replace vm_lock and detached flag with a
reference count
On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 6:38 PM Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 08:25:58PM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > static inline void vma_end_read(struct vm_area_struct *vma) {}
> >@@ -908,12 +948,8 @@ static inline void vma_init(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct mm_struct *mm)
> > vma->vm_mm = mm;
> > vma->vm_ops = &vma_dummy_vm_ops;
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vma->anon_vma_chain);
> >-#ifdef CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK
> >- /* vma is not locked, can't use vma_mark_detached() */
> >- vma->detached = true;
> >-#endif
> > vma_numab_state_init(vma);
> >- vma_lock_init(vma);
> >+ vma_lock_init(vma, false);
>
> vma_init(vma, mm)
> memset(vma, 0, sizeof(*vma))
> ...
> vma_lock_init(vma, false);
>
> It looks the vm_refcnt must be reset.
>
> BTW, I don't figure out why we want to skip the reset of vm_refcnt. Is this
> related to SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU?
Earlier memset(vma, 0, sizeof(*vma)) already zeroes the entire
structure, so vm_refcnt is already 0 and does not need to be reset
again.
>
> > }
> >
>
> --
> Wei Yang
> Help you, Help me
Powered by blists - more mailing lists